Mental Illness and Sartre’s Existentialism
An Evaluation of the Implications of Mental Illness for Practical Freedom and Ontological Freedom
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33011/cuhj20253039Keywords:
predeterminism, freedom, responsibility, consciousness, existence precedes essence, sartre, mental illnessAbstract
To what degree, if at all, does suffering from a mental illness reduce one’s freedom? Jean-Paul Sartre stated that “Mental illness is the way out a free organism, in its total unity, invents in order to live in an unlivable situation.” In this paper, I critically evaluate Sartre’s conception of mental illness, examining its implications for practical freedom and ontological freedom. Sartre’s argument that mental illness results from an “unlivable situation” indicates that external factors are the causes of these conditions. However, his rejection of the positivist psychiatry model neglects to consider the complexities of mental health issues, which include a combination of biological, environmental, psychological, and genetic factors. This evaluation contends that mental illness itself reduces one’s practical freedom via its choice-inhibiting symptoms, constraining the sufferer’s ability to shape the essence of her being. Furthermore, I argue that, in accordance with Sartre’s conception of mental illness, mental health issues are perpetuated by various societal conditions which worsen the sufferer’s symptoms by limiting her practical freedom within her external reality. Additionally, this evaluation critiques Sartre’s rejection of mental illness as the result of genetic conditions. I assert that genetic predispositions to mental illness indicate a factor of predetermination––a philosophy that is incompatible with Sartre’s definition of ontological freedom. Hence, I challenge the validity of Sartre’s famous claim that “existence precedes essence” (1975). This paper also posits a proportional relationship between ontological freedom and responsibility, demonstrating how a reduction in ontological freedom necessitates a corresponding reduction in a mentally ill individual’s moral responsibility. Finally, I propose an addendum to Sartre’s contention that all individuals are condemned to be free: because ontological freedom comes in varying degrees, all individuals are not equally condemned to be free.
To see the complete thesis, please visit https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/undergraduate_honors_theses/k0698889w.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors whose work is accepted and who publish with The University of Colorado Honors Journal agree to the following terms:
1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all objects that may result in subsequent electronic or print publication or distribution.
2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a non-exclusive license, which grants the Journal the right to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions: a. Right of publication in the print format of the journal; b. Right of publication in the online and/or digital format of the journal; c. Right to use in promotional or other journal-related activities, as defined by the journal.
4. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
5. The Author represents and warrants that: a. the Work is the Author’s original work; b. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party; c. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher; d. the Work has not previously been published; e. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and f. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
6. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
11-August-2014